Question:
Recall how the Schrödinger equation was motivated by the non-relativistic dispersion relation E=p22m. If we follow the same procedure for the case of a relativistic dispersion relation E2=p2c2+m2c4), what equation do we arrive at? (For simplicity consider the one-dimensional case)
Solution:
Here comes the math. This problem scare me at first, but once I go through the lecture on deriving the Schrödinger equation it wasn't so hard to copy cat the approach here.
First of all, the operator iℏ∂∂t=E, and −iℏ∂∂x=p, we have:
E2=p2c2+m2c4(iℏ∂∂t)2=(−iℏ∂∂x)2c2+m2c4−ℏ2∂2∂t2=−ℏ2c2∂2∂x2+m2c4ℏ2∂2∂t2−ℏ2c2∂2∂x2+m2c4=01c2∂2∂t2−∂2∂x2+m2c2ℏ2=0(1c2∂2∂t2−∂2∂x2+m2c2ℏ2)ϕ=0
To be honest, I don't really sure what I am doing, I am just copying what the lecture did. I will explain what these means in the next post.
Recall how the Schrödinger equation was motivated by the non-relativistic dispersion relation E=p22m. If we follow the same procedure for the case of a relativistic dispersion relation E2=p2c2+m2c4), what equation do we arrive at? (For simplicity consider the one-dimensional case)
Solution:
Here comes the math. This problem scare me at first, but once I go through the lecture on deriving the Schrödinger equation it wasn't so hard to copy cat the approach here.
First of all, the operator iℏ∂∂t=E, and −iℏ∂∂x=p, we have:
E2=p2c2+m2c4(iℏ∂∂t)2=(−iℏ∂∂x)2c2+m2c4−ℏ2∂2∂t2=−ℏ2c2∂2∂x2+m2c4ℏ2∂2∂t2−ℏ2c2∂2∂x2+m2c4=01c2∂2∂t2−∂2∂x2+m2c2ℏ2=0(1c2∂2∂t2−∂2∂x2+m2c2ℏ2)ϕ=0
To be honest, I don't really sure what I am doing, I am just copying what the lecture did. I will explain what these means in the next post.
No comments:
Post a Comment