Believe it or not, there are even more property in the cross product. This time our goal is the BAC-CAB identity
→a×(→b×→c)=→b(→a⋅→c)−→c(→a⋅→b).
To prove this, we need this result first, the so-called contraction identity.
ϵijkϵist=δjsδkt−δjtδks.
To be honest, I don't really understand how does one come up with the identity, but it is relatively easy to verify that it is correct, and under what condition (that i does not equal any of j,k,s,t
With that, we express the right hand side as follow:
→a×(→b×→c)=→a×(ϵpqrbpcqer)=ϵsrtasϵpqrbpcqet=ϵsrtϵpqrasbpcqet=ϵrtsϵrpqasbpcqet=(δtpδsq−δtqδsp)asbpcqet=δtpδsqasbpcqet−δtqδspasbpcqet=asbtcset−asbsctet=→b(→a⋅→c)−→c(→a⋅→b)
→a×(→b×→c)=→b(→a⋅→c)−→c(→a⋅→b).
To prove this, we need this result first, the so-called contraction identity.
ϵijkϵist=δjsδkt−δjtδks.
To be honest, I don't really understand how does one come up with the identity, but it is relatively easy to verify that it is correct, and under what condition (that i does not equal any of j,k,s,t
With that, we express the right hand side as follow:
→a×(→b×→c)=→a×(ϵpqrbpcqer)=ϵsrtasϵpqrbpcqet=ϵsrtϵpqrasbpcqet=ϵrtsϵrpqasbpcqet=(δtpδsq−δtqδsp)asbpcqet=δtpδsqasbpcqet−δtqδspasbpcqet=asbtcset−asbsctet=→b(→a⋅→c)−→c(→a⋅→b)
No comments:
Post a Comment