Question:
Does the angular momentum operator commutes with the Hamilitonian in the isotropic potential?
Solution:
The Hamilitonian operator is ˆH=ˆp22m+ˆV.
[Lk,H]=[Lk,ˆp22m+ˆV]=12m[Lk,ˆp2]+[Lk,ˆV]
Again, in order not to clutter the derivation, let's solve a subproblem first.
[La,ˆp2]=[La,pbpb]=[La,pb]pb+pb[La,pb]=ϵabcpcpb+pbϵabcpc=ϵabcpcpb+pbϵabcpc=2ϵabcpbpc=0
The last equality comes from the fact that the sum cancel each other! Suppose a=1, then the non-vanishing terms of the sum is just p2p3−p3p2, which is simply 0. Looking backward, if I go just a little further with my question 3, I would have reach the same result. Now let's solve the potential side
[La,xbxb]=[La,xb]xb+xb[La,xb]=ϵabcxcxb+xbϵabcxc=ϵabcxcxb+xbϵabcxc=2ϵabcxbxc=0
The reasoning is identical, so the commutator is just 0.
Does the angular momentum operator commutes with the Hamilitonian in the isotropic potential?
Solution:
The Hamilitonian operator is ˆH=ˆp22m+ˆV.
[Lk,H]=[Lk,ˆp22m+ˆV]=12m[Lk,ˆp2]+[Lk,ˆV]
Again, in order not to clutter the derivation, let's solve a subproblem first.
[La,ˆp2]=[La,pbpb]=[La,pb]pb+pb[La,pb]=ϵabcpcpb+pbϵabcpc=ϵabcpcpb+pbϵabcpc=2ϵabcpbpc=0
The last equality comes from the fact that the sum cancel each other! Suppose a=1, then the non-vanishing terms of the sum is just p2p3−p3p2, which is simply 0. Looking backward, if I go just a little further with my question 3, I would have reach the same result. Now let's solve the potential side
[La,xbxb]=[La,xb]xb+xb[La,xb]=ϵabcxcxb+xbϵabcxc=ϵabcxcxb+xbϵabcxc=2ϵabcxbxc=0
The reasoning is identical, so the commutator is just 0.
No comments:
Post a Comment