Disclaimer - this is just an attempt - it never finishes. Blogging this so that I don't forget where I were:
Recall the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator problem as follow:
ˆHψ=Eψ(ˆp22m+12mω2x2)ψ=Eψ(−ℏ22m∂2∂x2+12mω2x2)ψ=Eψ
The so called series method is basically assume ψ as an analytic function, as such, it can be (locally) represented as a power series.
ψ(x)=∞∑k=0akxk
Substituting it back to the problem, we have
Eψ=(−ℏ22m∂2∂x2+12mω2x2)ψE(∞∑k=0akxk)=(−ℏ22m∂2∂x2+12mω2x2)(∞∑k=0akxk)
So we simply match the coefficients.
Ea0=−ℏ22m(2)a2Ea1=−ℏ22m(3)(2)a3Eak=−ℏ22m(k+1)(k+2)ak+2+12mω2x2(ak−2)
This apparently lead to the recurrence that we can use to solve for ak, but I am stuck on the next step that I can foresee, how do I know I have found the Gaussian?
Recall the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator problem as follow:
ˆHψ=Eψ(ˆp22m+12mω2x2)ψ=Eψ(−ℏ22m∂2∂x2+12mω2x2)ψ=Eψ
The so called series method is basically assume ψ as an analytic function, as such, it can be (locally) represented as a power series.
ψ(x)=∞∑k=0akxk
Substituting it back to the problem, we have
Eψ=(−ℏ22m∂2∂x2+12mω2x2)ψE(∞∑k=0akxk)=(−ℏ22m∂2∂x2+12mω2x2)(∞∑k=0akxk)
So we simply match the coefficients.
Ea0=−ℏ22m(2)a2Ea1=−ℏ22m(3)(2)a3Eak=−ℏ22m(k+1)(k+2)ak+2+12mω2x2(ak−2)
This apparently lead to the recurrence that we can use to solve for ak, but I am stuck on the next step that I can foresee, how do I know I have found the Gaussian?
No comments:
Post a Comment