Problem:
Solution:
For the purpose of practicing, let's just prove Proposition 8.
For (i), if V⊂W, then for any polynomial p∈I(W) must vanish in W and therefore vanish in V, so p∈I(V) and I(W)⊂I(V).
On the other hand, if I(W)⊂I(V). We know W is a set of common zero for a set of polynomial gi, so ∀i, gi∈I(W)⊂I(V), therefore ∀i, ∀v∈V, gi(v)=0, therefore ∀v∈V, v∈W.
To be honest, I cheated, I couldn't figure out the second part myself. The critical part I missed is the red part. Next time I should try harder before I cheat and maybe work backwards from the conclusion.
Part (a) is trivial though. We have part (i) already, so V=W⟹V⊂W and W⊂V, so I(W)⊂I(V) and I(V)⊂I(W), so we got the easy conclusion!
Part (b) is also trivial, it is simply (i) and not (ii) !
Solution:
For the purpose of practicing, let's just prove Proposition 8.
For (i), if V⊂W, then for any polynomial p∈I(W) must vanish in W and therefore vanish in V, so p∈I(V) and I(W)⊂I(V).
On the other hand, if I(W)⊂I(V). We know W is a set of common zero for a set of polynomial gi, so ∀i, gi∈I(W)⊂I(V), therefore ∀i, ∀v∈V, gi(v)=0, therefore ∀v∈V, v∈W.
To be honest, I cheated, I couldn't figure out the second part myself. The critical part I missed is the red part. Next time I should try harder before I cheat and maybe work backwards from the conclusion.
Part (a) is trivial though. We have part (i) already, so V=W⟹V⊂W and W⊂V, so I(W)⊂I(V) and I(V)⊂I(W), so we got the easy conclusion!
Part (b) is also trivial, it is simply (i) and not (ii) !
No comments:
Post a Comment