Problem:
Solution:
Part (a) is almost completely analogous to Exercise 11. Skipped here for brevity.
Suffice to say the answer is (t2,t3,t4)=V(y2−x3,z−x2).
To complete the rest, we claim I(V)=⟨y2−x3,z−x2⟩.
By substituting (t2,t3,t4) to a polynomial p∈⟨y2−x3,z−x2⟩, we show that ⟨y2−x3,z−x2⟩⊂I(V)
For the reverse inclusion, the problem already hinted on we cannot use the same approach as Exercise 11 for part (b), so we try division algorithm.
A polynomial in k[x,y,z] can be thought of as k[x,y][z], the ring of polynomial on the ring of k[x,y], that is, we treat any polynomial of the form f(x,y) as a coefficient to the power of z, so we can use division to show for any polynomial
a(x,y,z)=(z−x2)b(x,y)+c(x,y).
This is really no different from showing a(z)=(z−m)b(z)+c, just simple division.
Doing this again on the remainder give c(x,y)=(y2−x3)d(x)+e(x)y+f(x), so we get
a(x,y,z)=(z−x2)b(x,y)+(y2−x3)d(x)+e(x)y+f(x).
Putting the parametrized curve into the equation, we get
a(x,y,z)=e(t2)t3+f(t2)=0.
Here is the interesting part, we claim e(x) and f(x) are both 0 polynomial.
The reason is that if we look at e(t2)t3+f(t2) as a polynomial in t, it is identically zero so all coefficients are 0, the polynomial has no constant term and t terms, all even terms have coefficients comes from f and all odd terms have coefficients comes from e, so all the coefficients of e and f are zero!
This prove the tricky part for this problem.
Writing a polynomial in a(x,y,)∈I(V) as a(x,y,z)=(z−x2)b(x,y)+(y2−x3)d(x), we proved that I(V)⊂⟨y2−x3,z−x2⟩.
So we conclude I(V)=⟨y2−x3,z−x2⟩.
Solution:
Part (a) is almost completely analogous to Exercise 11. Skipped here for brevity.
Suffice to say the answer is (t2,t3,t4)=V(y2−x3,z−x2).
To complete the rest, we claim I(V)=⟨y2−x3,z−x2⟩.
By substituting (t2,t3,t4) to a polynomial p∈⟨y2−x3,z−x2⟩, we show that ⟨y2−x3,z−x2⟩⊂I(V)
For the reverse inclusion, the problem already hinted on we cannot use the same approach as Exercise 11 for part (b), so we try division algorithm.
A polynomial in k[x,y,z] can be thought of as k[x,y][z], the ring of polynomial on the ring of k[x,y], that is, we treat any polynomial of the form f(x,y) as a coefficient to the power of z, so we can use division to show for any polynomial
a(x,y,z)=(z−x2)b(x,y)+c(x,y).
This is really no different from showing a(z)=(z−m)b(z)+c, just simple division.
Doing this again on the remainder give c(x,y)=(y2−x3)d(x)+e(x)y+f(x), so we get
a(x,y,z)=(z−x2)b(x,y)+(y2−x3)d(x)+e(x)y+f(x).
Putting the parametrized curve into the equation, we get
a(x,y,z)=e(t2)t3+f(t2)=0.
Here is the interesting part, we claim e(x) and f(x) are both 0 polynomial.
The reason is that if we look at e(t2)t3+f(t2) as a polynomial in t, it is identically zero so all coefficients are 0, the polynomial has no constant term and t terms, all even terms have coefficients comes from f and all odd terms have coefficients comes from e, so all the coefficients of e and f are zero!
This prove the tricky part for this problem.
Writing a polynomial in a(x,y,)∈I(V) as a(x,y,z)=(z−x2)b(x,y)+(y2−x3)d(x), we proved that I(V)⊂⟨y2−x3,z−x2⟩.
So we conclude I(V)=⟨y2−x3,z−x2⟩.
No comments:
Post a Comment