Problem:
Solution:
Part (a)
f′=r(x−a)r−1h+(x−a)rh′=(x−a)r−1(rh+(x−a)h′)
Therefore h1=rh+(x−a)h′, h1(a)=rh(a)+(a−a)h′=rh(a)≠0.
Part (b)
Using product rule, we differentiate one of the term and keep the rest, and then we sum them up, so the derivative is
f′=n∑k=1(cr(x−ak)rk−1n∏j=1,j≠k(x−aj)rj)
Therefore, for the final sum, we can always factor out (x−a1)r1−1⋯(x−an)rn−1
f′=n∏j=1(x−aj)rj−1n∑k=1(crn∏j=1,j≠k(x−aj))
Now after factoring out, the k term is simply cr(x−a1)⋯(x−an) (the product goes without (x−ak)), so the k term does not vanish for ak, but all other terms does, That's why H does not vanish for any ak.
Part (c)
With part (b), we proved (x−a1)r1−1⋯(x−an)rn−1 is a common factor. The only roots in f is {a1⋯an}, so if the common factor is not greatest, we contradict the fact that H does not vanish for any of those roots.
Solution:
Part (a)
f′=r(x−a)r−1h+(x−a)rh′=(x−a)r−1(rh+(x−a)h′)
Therefore h1=rh+(x−a)h′, h1(a)=rh(a)+(a−a)h′=rh(a)≠0.
Part (b)
Using product rule, we differentiate one of the term and keep the rest, and then we sum them up, so the derivative is
f′=n∑k=1(cr(x−ak)rk−1n∏j=1,j≠k(x−aj)rj)
Therefore, for the final sum, we can always factor out (x−a1)r1−1⋯(x−an)rn−1
f′=n∏j=1(x−aj)rj−1n∑k=1(crn∏j=1,j≠k(x−aj))
Now after factoring out, the k term is simply cr(x−a1)⋯(x−an) (the product goes without (x−ak)), so the k term does not vanish for ak, but all other terms does, That's why H does not vanish for any ak.
Part (c)
With part (b), we proved (x−a1)r1−1⋯(x−an)rn−1 is a common factor. The only roots in f is {a1⋯an}, so if the common factor is not greatest, we contradict the fact that H does not vanish for any of those roots.
No comments:
Post a Comment